London, August 13, 2025 – British entrepreneur and public interest advocate Alkiviades “Alki” David has launched a significant legal action in the King’s Bench Division of the High Court, claiming that executives of the Daily Mail, corporate associates, and journalist Rory Tingle have engaged in a deliberate scheme of retaliation, suppression, and manipulation of public narrative.

The extensive 100+ page legal document filed under Claim No: KB-2025-001991 in front of Justice Cotter compiles years of investigative work and diverse evidence, including links between corporate entities and platforms known for distributing Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), a misleading arrest caught on surveillance cameras, and the disproportionate promotion of legal adversaries while sidelining critical legal developments.

**Key Allegations from the Legal Filing:**

**Corporate Involvement with CSAM Channels:** The legal documentation draws a direct line from MailOnline (Daily Mail) to DailyMailTV, which is distributed in the U.S. by CBS Media Ventures, ultimately reaching CBS Interactive and its subsidiary Download.com. This structure has been repeatedly pointed out in whistleblower disclosures and investigative journalism as a conduit for CSAM dissemination. The filing warns of a “corporate environment of foreseeable risk” where legitimate media content coexists with dangerously unregulated platforms.

**Retaliation through False Arrest:** On August 4, 2025, David was apprehended outside the Daily Mail Group’s Derry Street premises following accusations from Rory Tingle of minor physical contact. Contradictory CCTV footage from the Metropolitan Police later surfaced, showing that David was actually assaulted by security personnel. He was released on the next day with merely a caution. This event took place directly after David published a damning 13-minute exposé regarding corporate malfeasance.

**Violation of Ambassadorial Duties:** Appointed by Prime Minister Gaston Browne, David serves as an ambassador for the green economy of Antigua and Barbuda. The submission contends that his wrongful arrest amounts to severe interference with his ambassadorial responsibilities and obstructs justice in an international context.

**Media Manipulation:** The Daily Mail, known for its extensive reporting on David's previous $900 million sexual assault case, allegedly obscured subsequent proceedings, including a court-directed freeze of that judgment in July 2025. At the same time, the outlet is accused of generating positive coverage for adversaries Gary Dordick and Gloria Allred, while neglecting pertinent information that could weaken their narrative. Included in the filing are screenshot examples of this biased reporting.

**Corroboration from Independent Media:** Supporting evidence includes a viral article from Shockya published on August 10, 2025, titled “Daily Mail’s Rory Tingle Caught on Viral Video Fabricating Assault Claim to Protect Corporate Child Sexual Abuse Material Empire,” which has garnered significant attention and reinforces David’s claims of wrongful arrest.

**Legal Demands:** The High Court filing seeks the following:

- Judicial acknowledgment of the entire evidence pattern.
- Criminal investigation referral and arrest of Rory Tingle for multiple offenses, including perjury and obstructing justice.
- Recognition of the breaches against ambassadorial protections and classifying the incident as an obstruction of justice.

The attached exhaustive exhibit submitted to the court contains corporate linkage diagrams, arrest timelines, independent news coverage screenshots, and promotional material for adversaries that have displayed concerning ties to David's case.

Alkiviades David commented, “This challenge isn't just personal; it's crucial for unearthing the machinery that employs the media, the legal system, and corporate power to silence critics. The public should be informed when mainstream outlets are financially aligned with platforms involved in child exploitation and when journalists manipulate the justice process against whistleblowers.”

The complete court exhibit is accessible to Justice Cotter via the King’s Bench Division, and a publicly available copy ensures transparency. This legal action represents a considerable escalation in David's ongoing fight against what he describes as a “modern-day, corporate-protected criminal syndicate.”