It's not often a thousand-word social media post from a US tech firm goes viral.
But the post from Palantir - a 22-point manifesto of sorts - currently has over 30 million views on X.
It is the work of the controversial company's co-founder and chief executive, who has criticised the belief that all cultures are equal and called for universal national service.
Alex Karp also called the disarmament of Germany and Japan after World War Two an overcorrection, backed AI weapons and condemned ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures.
Karp's views matter - his company's growing roster of UK government contracts include the NHS, the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the Financial Conduct Authority and 11 police forces.
Not to mention its multimillion dollar deals with the US and other powerful governments.
But as the firm increasingly embeds itself in public bodies, the opinions and influence of its leaders leave some fearful.
Every alarm bell for democracy must ring, Prof Shannon Vallor, chair of ethics of data and AI at Edinburgh University, told the BBC.
Palantir insiders compare what they do to plumbing - joining together scattered stores of information. They say their products allow large, often incompatible sets of data to be analysed and searched easily, including through the use of commercial AI systems.
To this end, the firm won a £300m contract to create a data platform for the NHS - a role that has been opposed by the British Medical Association (BMA) and provokes continuing intense debate.
In the last few days, Palantir's UK boss Louis Mosley turned to X to attack a critical cover story in the BMA's British Medical Journal.
But consultant Tom Bartlett, who previously led the NHS team responsible for delivering the Federated Data Platform - built on Palantir software - told the BBC Palantir was uniquely suited to the messy NHS data problems that have been accumulating over the last 25 years.
The $400bn (£297bn) firm is also a major military contractor. Its AI-enabled war-fighting technology is used by Nato, Ukraine and by the US, including in its conflict with Iran.
In the UK, the MoD has signed a similarly controversial three-year contract worth £240m for tech that it said would support the so-called kill-chain, fusing together data provide to produce faster options for attacking an enemy target.
Palantir says it employs around 950 people in the UK, making up 17% of its global workforce.
But some critics argue its work with US immigration enforcement and with Israel's military should disqualify it.
Others cite the opinions of Palantir co-founder and chairman Peter Thiel, a libertarian backer of Donald Trump, and Karp, as reasons to exclude it.
Karp, who has a doctorate in social theory, is one of a number of wealthy tech leaders - also including Elon Musk - to promote political and ideological theories.
In point 16 of the X post, Karp wrote: The culture almost snickers at Musk's interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves.
Vallor said unelected men like Karp were imposing their own 'grand narratives' of cultural superiority, militarised control, and public power without public accountability.
Dr Rhiannon Mihranian Osborne of the health campaign group Medact told the BBC: Every day that the NHS continues this contract with Palantir makes our health system complicit in Palantir's violent operations, such as AI warfare, and deeply alarming ideology, which includes powering America and its allies to their 'innate superiority'.
In a statement to the BBC, Palantir said it was deeply proud to be helping the UK government to deliver more NHS operations, speed up cancer diagnosis, keep Royal Navy ships at sea for longer and tackle domestic violence.
The Department of Health pointed us to remarks in April by Health Secretary Wes Streeting in which he defended the use of their technology but said he was not a fan of the people who run Palantir and described some of the things said by them in the US as abominable.
