ALEXANDRIA, Va. (PulseWire) — In a notable development, a grand jury has opted not to re-indict New York Attorney General Letitia James on charges related to mortgage fraud, marking a second rejection of such moves and underscoring the fraught relationship between the Trump administration and its political opponents.
This decision is a significant setback for the Justice Department after a Virginia judge dismissed the original indictments against James and former FBI Director James Comey, citing the improper appointment of the prosecuting attorney, Lindsey Halligan. James was initially accused of fraudulently obtaining favorable loan terms on a property purchase in Norfolk, where she has family ties.
The charges against James were widely viewed as influenced by Trump’s administration, given that they surfaced soon after his public calls for action against political adversaries. James has strongly defended herself against these allegations, labeling them as politically motivated and an attempt to undermine her work as a prominent critic of Trump.
James' legal team argued that she signed standard documents regarding the purchase of a home, emphasizing that her intentions were consistent with the agreement made with her lender. Prosecutors claim she violated this agreement by renting out the property, while James insists that her actions were legally sound.
In a statement following the grand jury's latest ruling, James' attorney asserted that it signifies the end of a case that should never have begun, warning that continued pursuit would threaten the rule of law and justice integrity.
Meanwhile, the allegations against Comey remain unresolved as complications arise in his ongoing case. The contrasting fates of these politically charged cases showcase the tensions at play in the current U.S. political landscape.
