The fatal shooting of a woman in Minneapolis by a federal law-enforcement officer is laying bare the sharp divides in American politics – and threatening to inflame an already contentious debate over immigration policy.

The incident took place in broad daylight. There are multiple videos taken by bystanders from various locations. And yet even the basic facts are being disputed.

Almost immediately after the shooting, two starkly different accounts began to take shape. Any ambiguities in the videos shared online were seized upon - different angles and different screengrabs were used to push a particular narrative.

And on the public stage, state and federal officials openly disagreed.

According to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, the driver – 37-year-old Renee Good – was to blame. As she drove away from ICE officers, she weaponised her car in a domestic terror attack, Noem said.

President Donald Trump, in a Truth Social post, blamed a professional agitator and a radical left movement of violence and hate. National Democrats and local officials in Minnesota painted a drastically different picture.

Jacob Frey, the Mayor of Minneapolis, stated that a federal agent recklessly used lethal force, demanding immigration enforcement officials to leave the city. Governor Tim Walz called the incident totally predictable and avoidable, linking it to the recent surge of federal immigration agents in the city.

This division was further highlighted when the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension announced that federal agencies would exclusively handle the investigation, escalating tensions between state and federal authorities.

With protests erupting in response to the shooting, Governor Walz cautioned against violence and positioned the state's National Guard on standby. This tension follows a history of conflict over immigration enforcement in Minnesota, which has become a focal point in the national debate.

The shooting draws evident parallels to the 2020 killing of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis, reigniting discussions about race, law enforcement, and public safety.

As the situation escalates, the political divide in the nation only seems to grow, with individuals on both sides of the spectrum interpreting the same events through vastly different lenses, further entrenched in their beliefs.