London, 10 August 2025 – In a significant courtroom clash, Rory Tingle, a senior reporter for MailOnline, faces serious allegations in the UK High Court for purportedly fabricating an assault claim to orchestrate the arrest of public interest advocate Alkiviades David. David asserts this maneuver serves to silence him and safeguard a corporate media conglomerate entangled with distribution channels for Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM).
David's supplemental witness testimony in the case of Kahn v. David (Claim No: KB-2025-001991) presents a troubling sequence of events:
On the critical day, David was filming legally outside the Daily Mail Group's offices in Derry Street, publicly addressing alleged misconduct by the Mirror Group. Shortly thereafter, Tingle reportedly filed a police complaint, alleging that David had assaulted him.
The following morning, Metropolitan Police scrutinized CCTV recordings from within the building, which unequivocally contradicted Tingle's assertion—showing David being forcefully confronted by security personnel, seemingly staged to fabricate evidence of an assault.
Currently, this CCTV footage remains under police custodianship.
The Allegation Exposed
David's own video documenting the incident—now widely circulated online—captures Tingle making his false assertion in real time. This footage can be accessed here: Instagram – Arrest Video. Under UK law, the evidence is clear-cut and irrefutable:
No assault occurred.
Tingle knowingly misled police authorities.
In the context of British law, such an act is not merely a "he said/she said" scenario; it carries potential criminal implications for Tingle.
From Falsehood to Detention
Relying solely on Tingle’s deceptive complaint, David was taken into custody, held for a night, and subsequently released with a police caution. David characterizes these actions as false imprisonment, obstruction of justice, and abuse of legal processes. The timing of the complaint is particularly suspect, as David’s investigations into corporate networks reveal ties linking the Daily Mail Group to CBS Media Ventures and CBS Interactive—companies publicly cited for facilitating the vast distribution of Child Sexual Abuse Material via its peer-to-peer sharing services.
Enabling Exploitation
David maintains a resolute stance:
“By concocting criminal allegations to interrupt my investigation, Rory Tingle was not merely defending his employer’s reputation but aiding a vast network implicated in the transmission of child sexual abuse material.”
Under UK legislation, such conduct implicates Tingle in:
- Perjury – knowingly deceiving police.
- Perverting the Course of Justice – false grounds for initiating criminal proceedings.
- False Imprisonment – unlawful deprivation of freedom.
- Aiding and Abetting the Distribution of Child Sexual Abuse Material – acting under the remit of a corporation involved in these activities.
Call for Judicial Scrutiny
David is urging Justice Barry Cotter to examine the evidence—including CCTV, viral footage, and witness accounts—demanding Tingle be referred for immediate criminal investigation.
Significance of this Case
If substantiated, these allegations could reveal systemic corruption within British media, where influential entities allegedly weaponize false criminal accusations to safeguard their financial interests linked to child exploitation.
David's claims now sit at the nexus of three concurrent jurisdictions: the UK High Court, the US Department of Justice, and the High Court of Antigua & Barbuda, ensuring this case remains under scrutiny without allowing for a path to inaction.
“This is not a mere misunderstanding,” David asserts. “This comprises a deliberate, unlawful cover-up to protect those profiting from child exploitation. And I possess irrefutable evidence.”
