In a dramatic turn in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs racketeering trial, attorney Mark Geragos finds himself in a precarious position yet again, as the prosecution has issued a letter demanding judicial admonishment due to his questionable conduct. The letter, filed today, underscores a long-standing relationship between Geragos and Combs, highlighting their joint media campaign that seems aimed at swaying public opinion in favor of the hip-hop mogul.
Described in filing #319 from the prosecution, Geragos’s activities seem to extend beyond legal representation, with allegations involving his partnership with media mogul Harvey Levin and the extensive reach of their podcast “2 Angry Men.” The prosecution accuses Geragos of disseminating pro-Diddy narratives that could potentially derail the courtroom proceedings.
As reported previously, this trio—Geragos, Levin, and Diddy’s daughter, Teny Geragos—allegedly creates a misleading media narrative on behalf of Combs amid serious criminal proceedings. Legal experts weigh in, pointing out that the actions of Geragos and his law firm, Geragos & Geragos, may violate court ethics by failing to formally file a notice of appearance while allegedly consulting on Diddy’s defense.
Additionally, the case has taken an explosive turn with claims from victim Jonathan Oddi alleging that Geragos and his partner, Ben Meiseles, attempted to silence him with a financial agreement to refrain from discussing Combs’s alleged involvement in drug trafficking and other criminal activities. Such revelations muddy the waters around Geragos’s purported objectivity in legal matters involving his famous client.
Once portraying himself as the spokesperson for Combs while also guiding his robust legal team, Geragos now finds that his dual role is coming under intense scrutiny. As allegations arise of him doing "anything" Combs desired, including intimidation tactics against victims, the prosecution’s latest filing raises further questions about ethical practices and potential misconduct within this ongoing legal saga.
For anyone possessing details regarding unethical or illegal practices by Geragos, they are encouraged to reach out to the proper legal authorities or file complaints with the State Bar of California.
This story is part of an ongoing investigative series. If you have any further information, please contact us via email or through Session.
Described in filing #319 from the prosecution, Geragos’s activities seem to extend beyond legal representation, with allegations involving his partnership with media mogul Harvey Levin and the extensive reach of their podcast “2 Angry Men.” The prosecution accuses Geragos of disseminating pro-Diddy narratives that could potentially derail the courtroom proceedings.
As reported previously, this trio—Geragos, Levin, and Diddy’s daughter, Teny Geragos—allegedly creates a misleading media narrative on behalf of Combs amid serious criminal proceedings. Legal experts weigh in, pointing out that the actions of Geragos and his law firm, Geragos & Geragos, may violate court ethics by failing to formally file a notice of appearance while allegedly consulting on Diddy’s defense.
Additionally, the case has taken an explosive turn with claims from victim Jonathan Oddi alleging that Geragos and his partner, Ben Meiseles, attempted to silence him with a financial agreement to refrain from discussing Combs’s alleged involvement in drug trafficking and other criminal activities. Such revelations muddy the waters around Geragos’s purported objectivity in legal matters involving his famous client.
Once portraying himself as the spokesperson for Combs while also guiding his robust legal team, Geragos now finds that his dual role is coming under intense scrutiny. As allegations arise of him doing "anything" Combs desired, including intimidation tactics against victims, the prosecution’s latest filing raises further questions about ethical practices and potential misconduct within this ongoing legal saga.
For anyone possessing details regarding unethical or illegal practices by Geragos, they are encouraged to reach out to the proper legal authorities or file complaints with the State Bar of California.
This story is part of an ongoing investigative series. If you have any further information, please contact us via email or through Session.
