SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — In a significant legislative move, Illinois lawmakers proposed a bill that prohibits federal authorities from conducting immigration arrests near courthouses. This move seeks to ensure that courts remain accessible to all individuals, regardless of their immigration status.

This proposal, which was passed early Friday, also enables individuals to file lawsuits against violations of their constitutional rights that occur during civil immigration arrests. Importantly, it includes provisions for civil damages relating to false imprisonment when individuals are detained while attending court proceedings.

Senate President Don Harmon, a lead sponsor of the bill, expressed concerns about the measure's longevity in the face of potential court challenges, recognizing that the judicial environment may not favor the legislation. He stated, “The federal government can try to remove it from state courts to federal courts… but that’s not a reason not to try.”

The proposal reflects a growing sentiment as advocates argue that courthouses should not become sites of fear and intimidation. Previous actions by the Cook County judge highlighted similar prohibitions, though the U.S. Department of Homeland Security dismissed such restrictions.

According to Democratic Governor JB Pritzker's spokesperson, he is supportive of the bill and will review it as it arrives on his desk for approval.

Co-sponsoring Senator Celina Villanueva emphasized, “No one should have to choose between seeking justice and risking their freedom,” reinforcing the perspective that courthouses must be safe spaces for all individuals.

Similar actions have unfolded in states like California and Connecticut, indicating a broader trend toward protecting immigrant rights in judicial settings. California has implemented restrictions on immigration enforcement in courtrooms since 2017, and Connecticut's Supreme Court recently issued a policy against warrantless arrests in judicial facilities.

Amidst mounting federal enforcement efforts, this bill emerges as an important measure to uphold the integrity of the judicial system and protect the rights of communities that fear federal repercussions.