Google Required to Share Data with Rivals Following Court Ruling

Mon Oct 20 2025 23:58:55 GMT+0300 (Eastern European Summer Time)

A recent decision by a US judge allows Google to retain its Chrome web browser but mandates it to share vital information with competitors.

In a significant court ruling, Google is permitted to keep its Chrome browser but must share search data with rivals, as ordered by District Judge Amit Mehta. This decision arises from ongoing antitrust litigation against Google, focusing on its monopolistic practices in online search. Though Google viewed the ruling as a victory, critics argue it doesn't adequately address illegal behaviors. The ruling is expected to positively impact smartphone manufacturers who may now promote alternative search engines.

Google will not have to sell its Chrome web browser but must share information with competitors, according to a US federal judge's order.

The remedies outlined by District Judge Amit Mehta come after a lengthy court battle concerning Google's dominance in online search.

The case revolved around Google's status as the default search engine on devices of various manufacturers, including its own platforms, like Android and Chrome, and others from Apple.

The US Department of Justice had sought Google's divestiture of Chrome, but the decision allows Google to maintain its browser while prohibiting exclusive contracts and obligating it to share pertinent search data with competitors.

Google had proposed less severe solutions, such as capping revenue-sharing agreements that help maintain its search engine as the default on other devices.

Following the ruling, Google asserted that it considered this a win, attributing part of the outcome to the evolving landscape brought on by artificial intelligence.

Today's decision recognizes how much the industry has changed through the advent of AI, which is giving people so many more ways to find information, Google expressed in a statement after the ruling.

In a previous judgment, Judge Mehta determined that Google had employed unfair methods to preserve a monopoly in the online search market detrimental to competition.

However, in the latest decision, Judge Mehta asserted that a total sale of Chrome was not appropriate for the case, allowing Google to keep its Android operating system.

Shares in Alphabet, Google's parent company, surged by over 8% following the ruling, expected to benefit smartphone manufacturers like Apple, Samsung, and Motorola, who will now have greater freedom in their promotional partnerships.

Despite the judgement being a considerable development, Google faces additional legal challenges, with a separate trial pending regarding its alleged monopolies in online advertising technology.