CEO of Alamo Trust Resigns Following Controversial Criticism

Wed Oct 29 2025 14:04:29 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

In a significant move, Kate Rogers has stepped down as CEO of the Alamo Trust amid public backlash led by Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick over her academic stance questioning traditional narratives of Texas history.

Kate Rogers has resigned from her position as the CEO of the Alamo Trust after facing intense scrutiny from Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. Patrick called for her ouster in response to Rogers' academic paper critiquing the conservative government’s educational policies, specifically her proposals for a more nuanced portrayal of Alamo history. As Texas prepares for a $400 million renovation of the historic site, this incident highlights ongoing disputes over the portrayal of history in educational contexts.

Kate Rogers, the former CEO of the Alamo Trust, has resigned amidst intense pressure from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who publicly criticized her for expressing views he deemed incompatible with the historical significance of the Alamo.

Rogers announced her resignation on Friday, stating that the circumstances surrounding her leadership role made it clear it was time to move on. This decision comes after Patrick's demand for her resignation following an academic paper she authored, which scrutinized the Texas Legislature's conservative education policies and proposed a more inclusive narrative of the Alamo's history.

I believe her judgment is now placed in serious question, Patrick wrote, echoing sentiments of a political climate increasingly scrutinizing historical interpretations related to race and national identity. He subsequently labeled her research and views as shocking and indicated a divide over how Texas history should be taught.

Rogers’ statement to the Associated Press conveyed mixed emotions about her departure, but she emphasized her commitment to presenting history in a way that reflects a broader spectrum of perspectives, including Indigenous accounts that she felt were being overshadowed by the state's conservative agenda.

In her paper, Rogers also cited influences such as the book “Forget the Alamo,” which challenges commonly held beliefs regarding the Texas Revolution and its connections to slavery, arguing that it is essential for educators to have autonomy in how they present historical facts.

Patrick's remarks and demands exemplify ongoing conflicts within Texas regarding historical narratives, especially those highlighting the complex roles of race and slavery in shaping the state's history. This controversy comes at a time when the Alamo is undergoing a significant $400 million renovation aimed at creating a new museum and visitor center by 2027.

The situation has drawn responses from various political figures, including Bexar County Judge Peter Sakai, who condemned Patrick’s interference as detrimental to the integrity of historical education.

This unfolding saga brings attention to broader discussions about how history is told in America, particularly in educational frameworks, amid fears of historical revisionism influenced by current political pressures.