Minnesota Launches Website to Challenge Federal Misinformation Amid ICE Shootings

Tue Feb 03 2026 17:48:25 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

In response to the fatal shootings by immigration agents, Minnesota's new website aims to counter federal claims, highlighting a growing rift between local and federal law enforcement.

Following the fatal shootings of Alex Pretti and others by federal immigration agents, Minnesota has launched a website to counter misinformation disseminated by the Trump administration. State officials are questioning the federal government's handling of evidence and challenging federal narratives about deportation practices. Amidst growing tensions, there have been collaborations between Minnesota and federal authorities to ensure fair investigations. This unprecedented divide has experts concerned about the implications for future cooperation in law enforcement.

A new Minnesota website lays out evidence to counter what officials have termed federal misinformation following the fatal shootings of two residents by immigration agents during the Trump administration’s crackdown. This initiative has deepened the divide between state and federal authorities, leading experts to express their concerns.

Minnesota's legal actions have intensified as officials seek to preserve evidence from the recent shooting of Alex Pretti, particularly after they were barred from the scene by federal agents. This move signals a clear shift in the relationship between Minnesota law enforcement and the federal government.

The Minnesota Department of Corrections launched the website to address misinformation from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) following the death of Pretti. The site presents examples of past cooperation where Minnesota officials complied with federal requests to detain individuals facing deportation, challenging claims that detainees were routinely released.

Videos published by the department show peaceful custody transitions from state facilities to federal agents, contradicting narrative presented by the Trump administration about immigration enforcement actions.

Legal experts are voicing their concerns about the unprecedented nature of the rift. Former federal prosecutor Jimmy Gurulé pointed out that in past disputes, issues were generally handled discreetly without public criticism between agencies.

The state’s legal team filed a lawsuit seeking to safeguard evidence related to the Pretti shooting, claiming federal officials' refusal to share vital evidence is a departure from standard practice. The federal authorities, on the other hand, dismissed the state's concerns as absurd, highlighting the tension in the ongoing investigations.

The legality of tactics and transparency surrounding immigration enforcement by ICE have raised alarms. Chris Mattei, another former prosecutor, noted that typically, the Justice Department would lead investigations into such circumstances, emphasizing the troubling state of affairs under the current administration.

In a potential step towards reconciliation, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz discussed ways to improve cooperation with President Trump, emphasizing the need for transparent and fair investigations into the incidents, signaling a possible shift in the ongoing conflict between state and federal authorities.