Concerns Rise Over ICE Arrests Following Check-Ins in San Diego

Wed Nov 26 2025 18:19:25 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

A recent petition challenges the detainment of immigrants following ICE check-ins, prompting widespread scrutiny of the government's practices. Advocacy groups are calling for due process and the cessation of these detentions.

Chancely Fanfan, a Haitian immigrant, was arrested by ICE after a scheduled check-in, raising concerns over the treatment of immigrants in San Diego. Advocates argue these arrests violate due process rights, highlighting a disturbing pattern of detentions without clear justification. A recent petition filed seeks to challenge these detentions, potentially impacting many others in similar situations.

SAN DIEGO — A week before a scheduled immigration court hearing, Chancely Fanfan, a 31-year-old Haitian man, found himself unexpectedly detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during what he believed would be his routine check-in. Fanfan, accompanied by his wife and infant, faced arrest on October 20 with no explanation provided beyond that 'the government required it.'

According to his lawyers, Fanfan has a clean criminal record and had diligently attended all scheduled hearings and check-ins since his arrival in the U.S. last year. His case, along with those of two other detainees, is central to a recent petition filed in the Southern District of California by the Center for Immigration Law and Policy and the Center for Human Rights & Constitutional Law.

Petitioners have had no criminal contact since their prior releases from DHS custody, and two petitioners have no criminal history of any kind, the petition states. The lawsuit raises alarms about due process violations, arguing that immigrants deemed fit for release are being detained again upon reappearing for check-ins.

The current legal action follows a notable escalatory trend in ICE check-in arrest practices, especially in San Diego post-October. Reports note a significant increase in these detentions, with advocates sensing a pattern aimed at targeting vulnerable individuals.

In addition, reports indicate that many facing similar circumstances have been summoned to report without prior warning, leading to fears of deportation among those affected. A representative from the UCLA School of Law’s Center for Immigration Law and Policy estimates that detentions in San Diego exceed 100 cases.

The petitioners’ situation encapsulates a broader issue within U.S. immigration policy, highlighting the potential for systemic injustices in the treatment of immigrants. As this case unfolds, with a federal judge expected to determine the legality of these detentions, many are watching closely, hoping for a ruling that recognizes their rights and provides clarity in an increasingly complex immigration landscape.