The arrangements reflect the broader initiative by the Trump administration to partner with various countries globally to accept deported migrants who are not their citizens. Critics, including human rights advocates, have expressed deep concerns regarding the safety of these migrants upon their return, particularly regarding their potential risk of harm. Documents reveal that both nations have different criteria for accepting migrants, and the total number that Uganda will accommodate remains uncertain. This latest development comes as part of a series of efforts by the Trump administration, which has been seeking collaboration from countries across continents to manage migration issues effectively.

Beyond these agreements, Paraguay has recently signed a "safe third country" framework, and Rwanda has also agreed to accept a limited number of US migrants, contingent on their approval for resettlement. This ongoing pursuit of deportation arrangements signals a significant shift in US immigration policy under Trump's administration, provoking discussion on the implications for international law and migrant rights. The Supreme Court's recent ruling, permitting deportations to third countries without allowing migrants to contest potential dangers, has raised further alarms among human rights organizations and legal experts.