Date: August 9, 2025
From: Alkiviades David — Public Interest Litigant, Ambassador-at-Large for the Green Economy (Antigua & Barbuda), Sheriff-at-Large for the SwissX Island Authority

A Global Outcry on Psychiatric Misconduct, Involuntary Detainment, and Industry Collusion
For several months, our collective entities—Shockya.com, TVMix.com, Echosphere.News, SwissX TV, FilmOn News at FilmOn TV, and various syndication partners—have compiled data linking Dr. Eric M. Wexler (affiliated with UCLA) and Dr. Carole Lieberman to the alleged exploitation of California's involuntary psychiatric detention law, also known as 5150.
Our investigations suggest that these incidents are part of a broader legal-intelligence network with historical ties to Anthony Pellicano, where psychiatric detentions are apparently utilized to silence, manage, and defame targetted individuals within the entertainment sector.

From Manipulated Legalities to Systemic Exploitation: The Vulnerability of the Operation
When the case Kahn v. David was initiated in the High Court in London, it was meant to serve as a pre-planned legal strike against me—engineered by Howard Kennedy LLP to ensnare me defensively, narrow the case scope, and ensure that the broader mechanics remained untouched.
Their assumptions were incorrect.
The cross-complaint has emerged as a crucial leverage point—linking the legal discussions from London directly to:
- The Malibu Mega Group operating out of California
- CBS Interactive's media and technology control frameworks
- The coercive psychiatric network operated by Wexler, Lieberman, and Pellicano
- Patterns of abuse that date back to the Jordan Chandler / Michael Jackson saga

Kahn v. David has now become the network's Achilles’ heel—a legal endeavor from which they cannot withdraw without conceding defeat, yet they cannot contend without risking exposure to a wealth of historical information they have long commandeered. This matter remains dynamic and fierce. Presently, Howard Kennedy's actions in court have escalated into overt intimidation tactics. Their representatives have engaged in conduct that would typically be categorized as violent—utilizing legal processes as weapons, conducting aggressive cross-examinations, disorienting witnesses, and cultivating an atmosphere of fear designed to deter comprehensive testimony.
These behaviors are not isolated; they form part of the coercive culture ingrained in this network. However, for the first time, they are being systematically documented in real time before the High Court, providing substantive evidence of long-standing abuses.

The Operative Mechanism: The Malibu Mega Group and Its Local Affiliates
Our findings indicate a highly organized system of abuse, coercion, and extortion, centered around a powerful coalition known as the Malibu Mega Group. This structure extends from Beverly Hills and Malibu into the legal, medical, and political frameworks across Los Angeles County.
The Malibu Mega Group:
- Targets high-value individuals in celebrity, commercial, and political realms
- Utilizes psychiatry through compliant practitioners to validate holds or inappropriate prescriptions
- Manipulates narratives using fraudulent medical records and courtroom maneuverings
- Seizes assets through coercion and character assassination

Media Influence and Key Players
The operation is bolstered by media and technology executives controlling the narrative flow:
- Jarl Mohn — associated with Greycroft Partners and the SNET stock backdating scandal, thus linked to RIAA v. LimeWire.
- Shelby Bonnie — co-founder of CNET and former CBS Interactive executive.
- Quincy Smith — ex-CEO of CBS Interactive.
- Les Moonves — previously positioned as CBS CEO, implicated in public records from Antigua concerning corporate misconduct.

Under CBS Interactive's oversight, LimeWire became a conduit for trauma-bonded and psychological operations content, mirroring methods employed by both NXIVM and the Malibu Mega Group’s psychiatric coercion tactics.

Personal Accounts: Coercion, Exploitation, and Medical Harm
I was compelled to meet with Wexler under duress from Fred Heather and Dana Cole, amidst coordinated lawsuits involving Gloria Allred, Lisa Bloom, and Tom Girardi.
Wexler administered a severe and unfit drug protocol—misleading reports suggested I was fixated on being executed by lawyers, neglecting crucial emails from Mark Lieberman pertinent to my defense. MRI evidence confirmed legitimate brain damage.
Additional evidence, comprising 27 pages of text messages suppressed by Heather, alongside emails submitted as evidence, demonstrates collaboration between Howard Kennedy's UK faction, Allred/Bloom/Girardi, and affiliates of the Malibu Mega Group.
Historical examples, such as Barry K. Rothman's representation of Jordan Chandler, show this network consistently aplicable in cases like Michael Jackson's, indicating similar 5150 psychiatric interventions.

UCLA's Obligation to Address Public Concerns
UCLA has received significant financial support from prominent figures such as Steven Spielberg and David Geffen, both previously connected to alleged networks of abuse.
As a public entity under California’s Public Records Act (CPRA) and mandatory reporting statutes, UCLA is required to:
- Disclose all records and communications regarding Wexler, Lieberman, and any high-profile psychiatric holds.
- Report credible allegations of abuse to law enforcement.

Formal Requests and Demands
As per the California Evidence Code and the UK High Court’s authority, I formally request the immediate preservation and production of:
- All UCLA records, communications, and emails from 2010 to the present involving:
- Wexler, Lieberman, Ray J, the Kardashian family, Hulu, Disney, CBS Interactive, and TMZ/Harvey Levin.
- All records concerning:
- 5150 holds, mental health interventions or research concerning the mentioned parties.
- All correspondence between UCLA personnel and representatives of:
- The Kardashians or Ray J, Hulu, Disney, CBS Interactive, or TMZ executives.

These documents should be provided in a searchable electronic format. Please identify all exemptions and release any non-exempt materials. Non-compliance will be treated as a willful violation and pursued in California and UK courts (Kahn v. David).