In a dramatic disclosure, businessman and whistleblower Alkiviades David is shining a spotlight on alleged injustices within the UK judicial system, particularly in his ongoing case known as The Cotter’s Court Matter (Mahim Khan v. David, KB-2025-001991). David, who lives with a severe traumatic brain injury, asserts that he has been ensnared in a web of false allegations, harassment, and procedural abuse.
Since the initiation of these allegations, David claims that irrefutable evidence proving their fabrication has been repeatedly ignored. He accuses authorities of complicity, stating that the judicial protections that should shield individuals have instead been weaponized to protect corrupt entities involved in questionable dealings, notably theft of intellectual property and serious exploitation cases.
A pivotal event took place on August 21, 2025, when police forces were dispatched to his home, surprising him with a police action that not only humiliated him but also appeared to be coordinated under the strictures of Judge Cotter's oversight. David argues that this incident typifies how systemic failures have been allowed to flourish within the realm of British law.
Furthermore, David draws attention to a salacious narrative propagated by major media outlets, branding him as a "900 million rapist," despite later retractions of the charges emerging as baseless. Despite the substantiation of his innocence, no major outlet, including CBS and CNET, has issued corrections or apologies for their initial characterizations, which continue to ravage his reputation.
In addition to the defamation, David recounts a harrowing incident in which he was physically assaulted during court proceedings by an individual named AJ Foulnellier. This attack occurred under the supervision of legal authorities who, David insists, should be upholding justice and safety within the courtroom. In his view, such violence exemplifies the extensive corruption and intimidation influencing his case.
David has also expressed concerns regarding the behavior of solicitors like Howard Kennedy LLP, whom he accuses of maintaining false allegations while simultaneously facilitating ongoing harassment. He claims the courts have failed to engage with credible evidence of this misconduct and that he has suffered unnecessarily for it, with repercussions extending to his personal well-being and that of his pets.
The implications of David's case extend beyond personal grievances, raising questions about systemic corruption within the judicial framework of the UK, especially concerning the abuse of power by police and courts to shield powerful syndicates. David is urging major judicial bodies and government entities, including the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office and the Government of Antigua & Barbuda, to intervene and investigate the ongoing abuses he alleges.
As he fights to expose these systemic failures, David emphasizes that the truth surrounding his situation and broader issues of corruption will find its way into the public realm, advocating for accountability and reform within a judicial system he believes has lost its moral compass.
