Justice Carroccia emphasized the gaps in the woman's evidence, stating, "the Crown cannot meet its onus on any of the counts before me." The judge noted discrepancies in the victim's statements when compared against video evidence, which although did not constitute consent, portrayed her as coherent and not in distress. The prosecution has yet to announce if they will appeal the ruling, as they express dissatisfaction with the outcome while reiterating the importance of a fair trial for all parties involved.