On Friday, five major news entities, including the Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), filed their joint lawsuit in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. They allege that OpenAI illicitly used their materials to train ChatGPT and are demanding substantial financial recompense, potentially reaching billions of dollars.
This lawsuit emerges as a Canadian counterpart to a similar case involving The New York Times that was filed against OpenAI and Microsoft in the U.S. in 2023. In that instance, the veteran news outlet accused the companies of copyright infringement, a claim that both OpenAI and Microsoft rejected.
Responding to the Canadian lawsuit, an OpenAI spokesperson stated, “We have not yet had the opportunity to review the allegations,” while asserting that their models rely on publicly available data compliant with fair use and international copyright principles.
The Canadian plaintiffs are requesting compensation of 20,000 Canadian dollars (approximately $14,700) for each article they allege was scrapped unlawfully for training purposes. Alongside this, they seek a portion of OpenAI's profits derived from what they claim is the unlawful exploitation of their content and a commitment from the company to cease such practices in the future.
As the AI landscape continues to evolve, this case could have far-reaching implications for the relationship between media organizations and technology firms, underlining the ongoing debate over copyright in the digital age.
This lawsuit emerges as a Canadian counterpart to a similar case involving The New York Times that was filed against OpenAI and Microsoft in the U.S. in 2023. In that instance, the veteran news outlet accused the companies of copyright infringement, a claim that both OpenAI and Microsoft rejected.
Responding to the Canadian lawsuit, an OpenAI spokesperson stated, “We have not yet had the opportunity to review the allegations,” while asserting that their models rely on publicly available data compliant with fair use and international copyright principles.
The Canadian plaintiffs are requesting compensation of 20,000 Canadian dollars (approximately $14,700) for each article they allege was scrapped unlawfully for training purposes. Alongside this, they seek a portion of OpenAI's profits derived from what they claim is the unlawful exploitation of their content and a commitment from the company to cease such practices in the future.
As the AI landscape continues to evolve, this case could have far-reaching implications for the relationship between media organizations and technology firms, underlining the ongoing debate over copyright in the digital age.
