TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Gaza’s Nasser Hospital became a death trap last week as it was targeted by Israeli forces, resulting in a devastating attack that has triggered international condemnation. The assault killed 22 individuals, among them journalists like Mariam Dagga. Reports indicate serious questions about the Israeli military’s justification and execution of the attack.
Israel's military has avowed to investigate and address “gaps” in their understanding of the incident, specifically noting that during the strikes, five journalists lost their lives, prompting an urgent call for scrutiny and transparency.
Analysis from the Associated Press utilized insights from former military officials, journalists, and various eyewitness accounts from individuals present during the strike to assess the situation critically.
Key takeaways from the horrifying event include:
The Importance of a Towel
The Israeli military targeted the hospital based on the belief that a video camera with a towel over it was being used as surveillance by Hamas. However, evidence suggests that the towel was a protective measure for the camera against the harsh conditions. The video journalist Hussam al-Masri, who was killed in the attack, regularly used a cloth to shield his equipment from the sun.
A Double-Tap Strike with Multiple Explosions
Eyewitness accounts revealed that the military struck a second time soon after the first round, leading to accusations of a “double tap”—a tactic criticized for targeting emergency responders. AP video's analysis confirmed at least four explosions, raising alarms about potential breaches of international humanitarian law.
Controversial use of Heavy Weaponry
Evidence shows that high-explosive tank shells were employed in the strike on the hospital. Experts in military operations state that less lethal options were available. Concerns have been raised about the rationale behind such decisions as the Israeli military has not yet clarified its engagement rules during the incident.
Discrepancies in Casualty Reports
Israel identified several fatalities as militants, with discrepancies evident as some individuals listed were found to be medical staff and first responders. This inconsistency, paired with a lack of visual evidence for some alleged militants, has widened scrutiny of military claims.
The strike has raised urgent questions about accountability, responsibility, and the urgent need for international investigation into these allegations against Israel.
Contributors include AP reporters from multiple regions as they work to uncover the complexities surrounding this tragic event.
