DUE-PROCESS HOLD IN EFFECT


No Warner–Paramount merger prior to judicial milestone




Countdown to January 16, 2026 · 9:00 AM AST


Loading countdown…

Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court · Public procedural milestone





Procedural Milestone: January 16, 2026 Hearing


The hearing scheduled for January 16, 2026 at 9:00 AM AST before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court’s High Court of Justice in Antigua & Barbuda represents a critical procedural milestone in the live proceedings currently on the court record.


This date is essential for the ongoing adjudication and any risk analysis affecting the proposed Warner–Paramount transaction.


Proceeding with corporate actions before this hearing runs the risk of preempting judicial determinations and complicating market stability.


For regulators, trustees, and compliance officers, resuming transaction deliberations should only occur after judicial clarity from the January 16 proceeding.




Appeal Context — David v. Mahim Kahn & Howard Kennedy LLP


The case progresses to appellate review in the Royal Courts of Justice, London, highlighting a contested judicial posture that intersects with jurisdictional and procedural oversight issues relevant to the merger.


Notably, the ongoing appeal may influence regulatory considerations and evidentiary access.




Regulator Warning! — SwissX Regulatory Record Notice


Source: SwissX (Record Custodian) · Date: 24 December 2025


STATUS: ALLEGATIONS PLEADED · IDENTITIES VERIFIED · NOTICE ONLY · NO FINDINGS ASSERTED

Authority and Purpose


This notice from SwissX formally indicates matters alleged in court proceedings with confirmed identities of named legal actors for regulatory record.


Status of Allegations


Referenced allegations relate to misconduct connected to entertainment-industry litigation, including reported witness manipulation and suppression of evidence.




Final Regulatory Finding


The Warner–Paramount merger must never happen. Approving consolidation under these conditions would institutionalize impunity and prejudice justice.


This is not activism. It is baseline governance.