In brief
On Thursday, UEFA issued a short, unambiguous statement calling for a boycott of FIFA tournaments if Infantino’s proposal to sell a stake in a FIFA‑UK company goes ahead. The proposal involves private investors such as Joshua Kushner, Trump’s son‑in‑law. Key national football associations, including the FA and Scottish FA, have echoed UEFA’s stance. The dispute could affect upcoming FIFA events, notably the U20 Women’s World Cup in Poland and the Women’s World Cup play‑offs later this year. Reactions from football insiders suggest some support for a challenge to Infantino, though a clear successor has not yet emerged.
The crisis hit Europe in the afternoon
At 4pm BST on Thursday, UEFA released a terse 11‑word statement that it will boycott FIFA competitions if Infantino’s plan to sell a 20% stake in a FIFA‑UK subsidiary co‑owned by private investors, including Joshua Kushner, comes to fruition.
The statement, delivered during an emergency meeting, reads simply: “UEFA and its national associations will not participate in FIFA competitions.”
Who’s opposing the deal?
The FA, Scottish FA and several other national bodies have reaffirmed UEFA’s stance, calling the move unacceptable. Concacaf’s 41 members have already rejected a similar proposal. These reactions stem from a perceived lack of consultation and a sense that Infantino is over‑reaching his authority.
Impact on upcoming events
The U20 Women’s World Cup, starting in Poland on 5 September, could be affected if European teams withdraw mid‑tournament. First‑round knockout fixtures and semi‑finals might see teams pulled out once the deadline for accepting Infantino’s deal passes on 19 September.
The next touchstone for FIFA competitions is the Women’s World Cup play‑offs in October, featuring England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. These nations have said they will not sit idle if the boycotts take effect.
Could Infantino survive?
Infantino, who came to power in 2016, is up for re‑election in March. Historically, FIFA presidents are rarely ousted, but the current wave of dissent is unprecedented. A few sources have floated names such as Nasser Al‑Khelaifi, but most insiders say he is unlikely to contest the role.
Former FIFA vice‑president David Bernstein believes a schism would be a “lose‑lose” for all involved, stressing that European participation is vital for the commercial success of FIFA events. Former UEFA chief executive Lars‑Christer Olsson has added that a rotating presidency might be a solution to prevent future concentration of power.
What might happen next?
FIFA has yet to respond publicly. The situation remains highly fluid, with national associations monitoring the debate closely. All eyes will be on March when INFANTINO’s next term is decided – whether he retains his position or faces an unprecedented challenge.
