While Trump may pursue geographical name changes, experts indicate that international consensus on such matters is rare. According to John Nyberg of the International Hydrographic Organization, there is currently no formal protocol for maritime naming. The U.S. Board on Geographic Names typically requires compelling reasons for name alterations and bases decisions on local acceptance.

This name debate draws parallels to other contentious maritime names worldwide, such as the ‘Persian Gulf’ versus ‘Arabian Gulf’ conflict between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and the differing titles given to the body of water bordered by Japan and Korea. As responses to Trump's proposition unfold, the conversation surrounding the geopolitical significance of place names is set to continue.

Emiliano Rodríguez Mega contributed to this report. Eve Sampson is a journalist focused on international affairs.