NEW YORK - A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) can resume sharing basic information about certain Medicaid enrollees with deportation officials starting Monday, a significant setback for several states that had filed lawsuits over privacy issues. The ruling issued by U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria allows HHS to share only basic biographical information about immigrants living illegally in the United States. This ruling follows a temporary block imposed on such data sharing last August, which had restricted the transmission of sensitive information like home addresses to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
The lawsuit emerged after reports indicated that HHS and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services were facilitating data sharing as part of the Trump administration's stricter immigration enforcement policies. The information that can now be shared is limited, and Chhabria emphasized that more detailed medical information still cannot be provided to immigration authorities.
The ruling is controversial as privacy advocates argue that sharing personal health data could deter immigrants from seeking emergency medical care, fearing possible repercussions related to their residency status. Although states cannot intervene in broader sharing at this time, they plan to appeal several aspects of the ruling.
In earlier actions, HHS disclosed personal data on millions of Medicaid enrollees beginning in June, and subsequent agreements have allowed DHS access to view the personal data of all Medicaid enrollees.
As immigration policies remain a focal point under the current administration, advocates express concerns over the repercussions that this data sharing could have on marginalized communities. HHS asserts that these measures comply with federal law and align with immigration enforcement objectives.
The lawsuit emerged after reports indicated that HHS and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services were facilitating data sharing as part of the Trump administration's stricter immigration enforcement policies. The information that can now be shared is limited, and Chhabria emphasized that more detailed medical information still cannot be provided to immigration authorities.
The ruling is controversial as privacy advocates argue that sharing personal health data could deter immigrants from seeking emergency medical care, fearing possible repercussions related to their residency status. Although states cannot intervene in broader sharing at this time, they plan to appeal several aspects of the ruling.
In earlier actions, HHS disclosed personal data on millions of Medicaid enrollees beginning in June, and subsequent agreements have allowed DHS access to view the personal data of all Medicaid enrollees.
As immigration policies remain a focal point under the current administration, advocates express concerns over the repercussions that this data sharing could have on marginalized communities. HHS asserts that these measures comply with federal law and align with immigration enforcement objectives.
