The Goncourt committee praised “Houris” as a powerful narrative that articulates the struggles and suffering, particularly emphasizing the plight of women during this troubling chapter of Algerian history. They lauded the book for its capacity to heighten awareness and challenge conventional historical narratives. Ironically, despite this recognition, Daoud's poignant account may not gain traction among readers in Algeria. The absence of an Algerian publisher, alongside the exclusion of his French publisher, Gallimard, from the Algiers Book Fair, adds to this disconnect. Moreover, the local media has barely acknowledged his triumph.
Daoud, who now resides in Paris, has faced potential legal repercussions for discussing the civil war, as a 2005 law imposes penalties for “instrumentalizing” the country's traumatic past. He expressed frustration at the societal reluctance to confront this dark history, highlighted by his daughter's disbelief regarding events he recounts from the past. Daoud, who was a journalist during the war, recalls the grim experience of reporting on the massacres, often having his accounts manipulated by authorities aiming to control the narrative.
While some in Algeria label him a traitor for critiquing the state, others celebrate his literary prowess. His prior works, including “Meursault Investigation,” have received acclaim and underscore his critical stance towards the political landscape in Algeria. Daoud's reflections on Algeria's societal issues, particularly the treatment of women and the politicization of historical narratives, reveal a desire for a broader recognition of the complexities of Algerian history.
During his acceptance speech, Daoud acknowledged that his ability to write “Houris” stemmed from the freedoms he found in France. He underscored the importance of having the right environment for creativity, emphasizing the need for openness and support for writers to thrive. As “Houris” represents both a personal and collective memory, its journey remains complicated, entangled in the geopolitics of literature and identity within and beyond Algeria.
Daoud, who now resides in Paris, has faced potential legal repercussions for discussing the civil war, as a 2005 law imposes penalties for “instrumentalizing” the country's traumatic past. He expressed frustration at the societal reluctance to confront this dark history, highlighted by his daughter's disbelief regarding events he recounts from the past. Daoud, who was a journalist during the war, recalls the grim experience of reporting on the massacres, often having his accounts manipulated by authorities aiming to control the narrative.
While some in Algeria label him a traitor for critiquing the state, others celebrate his literary prowess. His prior works, including “Meursault Investigation,” have received acclaim and underscore his critical stance towards the political landscape in Algeria. Daoud's reflections on Algeria's societal issues, particularly the treatment of women and the politicization of historical narratives, reveal a desire for a broader recognition of the complexities of Algerian history.
During his acceptance speech, Daoud acknowledged that his ability to write “Houris” stemmed from the freedoms he found in France. He underscored the importance of having the right environment for creativity, emphasizing the need for openness and support for writers to thrive. As “Houris” represents both a personal and collective memory, its journey remains complicated, entangled in the geopolitics of literature and identity within and beyond Algeria.
