Skip to main content
PulseWire News
CrimeUnited Kingdom, United States

Judge Approves Extradition of Hacker Targeting Environmental Groups

A UK court has greenlit the extradition of Amit Forlit, identified as the leader of a hacking operation tied to a lobbying effort for ExxonMobil.

By Karen ZraickSource: nytimes.com1 min read
Judge Approves Extradition of Hacker Targeting Environmental Groups
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

Amit Forlit is accused of stealing sensitive information from over 100 environmental organizations while allegedly working for a firm hired by the oil giant.

An English court made headlines Wednesday as it approved the extradition of Amit Forlit, a 57-year-old Israeli national, wanted by U.S. prosecutors for running a hacking operation that reportedly targeted environmental advocacy groups. Prosecutors claim that Forlit's companies netted over $16 million by illegally infiltrating more than 100 organizations, gathering confidential data on behalf of a lobbying firm associated with Exxon's interests.Details surrounding the allegations reveal that the firm connected with Forlit is the DCI Group, which is said to have been contracted by ExxonMobil. The oil company has faced numerous lawsuits from Democratic attorneys general and local officials, accusing it of covering up critical information about climate change to continue its oil sales unimpeded. The company's alleged history of deception has resulted in claims that it was complicit in a broader strategy to undermine environmental regulations.In a statement, ExxonMobil distanced itself from the hacking allegations, asserting it had no knowledge or involvement in such activities. The firm expressed its disapproval of any illegal acts, stating, "If there was any hacking involved, we condemn it in the strongest possible terms."DCI Group also refuted the allegations, emphasizing its commitment to legal compliance. Craig Stevens, a spokesperson for the lobbying firm, stated that no directives were given to engage in any referenced hacking, dismissing the claims as unfounded conspiracy theories posited by "radical anti-oil activists and their billionaire donors."As the case unfolds, it raises pressing questions about the lengths to which corporations might resort to protect their interests against environmental scrutiny and the broader implications on ethical lobbying practices in the corporate sector.

Topics

More on this story