In a significant ruling, a US judge in Boston has temporarily blocked the Trump administration's contentious initiative to deport migrants to Libya, highlighting concerns about due process rights for those affected. The ruling follows unsettling reports that the administration planned to commence these deportations in an effort to crackdown on immigration.

Judge Murphy's order emerged after immigration lawyers swiftly acted to challenge the proposed deportation flights. The judge emphasized that the administration's plan "blatantly" contradicted a previous injunction designed to safeguard the rights of migrants. This earlier ruling mandated the provision of written notices in the migrants' languages, alongside opportunities to contest their deportation.

As tension over the deportation policies escalates, Libyan Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh firmly rejected the notion of his nation becoming a destination for deported migrants, asserting that Libya cannot accept them "under any pretext."

While reports indicated that flights could commence imminently, the exact number of migrants targeted for deportation or their specific destinations within Libya remained unclear. Libya has been plagued by instability since the ousting of longtime leader Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, complicating the humanitarian implications of such a deportation initiative.

Officials have also suggested that Libya is not the only country being approached by the US for migrant deportations, with other African nations like Rwanda, Benin, and Angola potentially being explored as alternatives. This move raises further concerns, given it could intensify the crisis facing migrants who are already vulnerable in the current climate.