In a closely followed trial in Ontario, five former Canadian junior ice hockey players have been cleared of all sexual assault charges against a woman known as EM. Justice Maria Carroccia delivered the verdict on Thursday after meticulously reviewing evidence spanning eight weeks, ultimately declaring the players not guilty.
The group, which includes notable players Michael McLeod, Dillon Dube, Cal Foote, Alex Formenton, and Carter Hart, faced accusations of sexually assaulting EM in a hotel room in London, Ontario, during a Hockey Canada gala in 2018. Justice Carroccia cited the lack of credibility and reliability in EM's testimony as grounds for the acquittal, emphasizing that "the Crown cannot meet its onus."
The National Hockey League (NHL) has since stated that the players remain "ineligible" to participate in league activities pending a review of the judgment. Following the verdict, the accused players chose not to engage with reporters, although their attorneys issued statements reflecting relief and emphasizing the impact of the accusations on their lives and reputations.
EM, who was 20 at the time of the incident, participated virtually in the court proceedings and expressed significant disappointment over the ruling, with her lawyer asserting that the enormity of disbelieving a victim is profound. The center of the trial revolved around whether EM had consented to the sexual acts that took place post the meeting at a bar, with EM alleging she felt fearful and intoxicated, while the defense argued she willingly engaged in the activities.
Justice Carroccia noted discrepancies in EM's statements, indicating "uncertain memory" and suggesting she had consented during recorded incidents shown in court, although the videos themselves did not legally prove consent. The court’s ruling and detailed examination of the evidence have reignited discussions regarding consent, intoxication, and the public perception of victims in sexual assault cases.
The verdict has evoked strong reactions, with various individuals and groups expressing their disappointment outside the courthouse, reflecting the ongoing societal struggle surrounding sexual violence and its legal repercussions. As the prosecution considers the possibility of an appeal, public advocacy for EM continues, with supporters hopeful that this case will stimulate significant change in how sexual assault cases are handled across Canada.
