Kamala Harris' Secret Service Detail Rescinded: What You Need to Know

Tue Oct 21 2025 00:36:50 GMT+0300 (Eastern European Summer Time)

After exiting office, Vice President Kamala Harris has faced the cancellation of her Secret Service protection, raising questions about the motivations behind the decision and its implications.

Former Vice President Kamala Harris has had her Secret Service detail withdrawn by President Trump after serving for six months following her term. While the US Secret Service typically provides such protection, the decision has sparked criticism from prominent political figures. Experts are weighing in on the implications, security concerns, and whether the move indicates political retribution.

Why has Kamala Harris' security detail been withdrawn?

President Donald Trump has cancelled former Vice President Kamala Harris' Secret Service detail, seven months after she left office following her unsuccessful presidential campaign.

By law, the US Secret Service provides former vice-presidents and their families with six months of protection after their terms end, a term that can be extended under certain circumstances. Former President Joe Biden reportedly opted to extend Harris' protection for an additional year before leaving office, citing undisclosed reasons.

This recent cancellation has led to criticisms from various political leaders, including California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who view the action as politically motivated. They argue that the decision could endanger Harris, especially given her unique position as the first woman and person of color to serve as vice president.

A recent threat assessment reportedly found no current risks that justified the extension of security, yet Harris' team remains concerned about the heightened dangers faced by prominent political figures, especially those with controversial public profiles.

Political Repercussions and Security Concerns

Following the decision to withdraw her security, speculation about Trump's intentions arose. Critics believe it demonstrates a pattern of political retribution, as he has similarly revoked protections for former allies and critics alike. Commentators have pointed out that while Harris' security detail was a significant resource for the Secret Service, the agency is currently strained with other responsibilities, such as protecting international dignitaries at significant events.

The Landscape of Post-Office Protectiveness

Unlike former vice-presidents, former presidents are entitled to lifetime security protection. This disparity highlights the complexities surrounding security provisions in U.S. politics. Critics argue that the safety of public officials should not be influenced by political motivations.

As the discourse around Harris' security unfolds, additional layers of scrutiny are anticipated. Harris is poised to embark on a book tour promoting her latest publication, which may necessitate close attention to her evolving security posture amid the backdrop of political contention.