WASHINGTON (AP) — A Republican challenge targeting a core provision of the Voting Rights Act is on the docket at the Supreme Court this week, over a decade after previous significant changes to the landmark law. The argument centers on Louisiana's second majority Black congressional district and seeks to impose stricter limits on race considerations during redistricting.
Louisiana Attorney General Elizabeth Murrill argues that race-based redistricting is fundamentally contrary to our Constitution, as the state looks to eliminate considerations of race in the creation of districts. A ruling in favor of Louisiana could send shockwaves through redistricting efforts across the nation, particularly as partisan battles over district lines intensify.
With the conservative-majority court, the justices are poised to re-examine the implications of their past rulings, especially with Chief Justice John Roberts, who has historically scrutinized the Voting Rights Act, at the helm. In prior statements, Roberts has expressed skepticism regarding race-based districting and its implications.
This week’s case has deep roots; Black voters and civil rights advocates previously challenged and won lower court rulings in favor of a second majority Black district following the 2020 census, emphasizing the importance of representation in a state where one-third of the population is Black.
In light of recent rulings, such as the 2023 confirmation of voting rights violations in Alabama, Louisiana's case highlights ongoing racial issues within voting patterns. The Supreme Court has called for fresh arguments on whether Louisiana's actions...
Louisiana Attorney General Elizabeth Murrill argues that race-based redistricting is fundamentally contrary to our Constitution, as the state looks to eliminate considerations of race in the creation of districts. A ruling in favor of Louisiana could send shockwaves through redistricting efforts across the nation, particularly as partisan battles over district lines intensify.
With the conservative-majority court, the justices are poised to re-examine the implications of their past rulings, especially with Chief Justice John Roberts, who has historically scrutinized the Voting Rights Act, at the helm. In prior statements, Roberts has expressed skepticism regarding race-based districting and its implications.
This week’s case has deep roots; Black voters and civil rights advocates previously challenged and won lower court rulings in favor of a second majority Black district following the 2020 census, emphasizing the importance of representation in a state where one-third of the population is Black.
In light of recent rulings, such as the 2023 confirmation of voting rights violations in Alabama, Louisiana's case highlights ongoing racial issues within voting patterns. The Supreme Court has called for fresh arguments on whether Louisiana's actions...
