The concert drew in a crowd reportedly exceeding half a million, although official figures indicate attendance was in the hundreds of thousands. The atmosphere electrified as Thompson’s opening act resonated through the crowd. His rallying cry of “Za dom” (“for homeland”) was met with the audience's fervent response of “Spremni” (“ready!”), echoing a chant historically tied to the Ustasha. This connection has sparked outrage among opposition parties and various human rights organizations, who argue it promotes a dangerous form of nationalism.
Opponents of the concert, like Tena Banjeglav from Documenta, have expressed grave concerns, stating, “This has opened Pandora’s box... The government is fostering an environment where this rhetoric is seen as acceptable.” Conversely, defenders argue that Thompson’s military service during the war imbues his celebration of the chant with a legitimate context of freedom fighting.
The remarks from conservative commentator Matija Štahan suggest that the chant has taken on a "new meaning" in contemporary Croatia, likely resonating especially among the youth as a form of rebellion against the political mainstream. In contrast, organizations like the Youth Initiative for Human Rights (YIHR) condemn it outright, deeming it a fascist slogan that runs counter to Croatia’s obligations as an EU member and undermines acknowledgment of historical injustices.
The situation has been exacerbated by government reactions. Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic downplayed the significance of the chanting and has been photographed with Thompson, a move that has drawn ire from many. The ongoing nationalistic sentiment raises questions about the future of reconciliation efforts in Croatia, particularly as the government shifts focus towards celebrating military achievements over addressing past crimes.
Adding to the divide, historian Tvrtko Jakovina highlights how these developments are not just isolated incidents but part of a broader trend of rising nationalism and declining democratic values in Croatia post-Brexit. With key issues like tourism, climate change, and demographic challenges looming, critics accuse the government of diverting attention to foster nationalist sentiments instead of addressing pressing societal problems.
The implications of Thompson’s concert resonate deeply, as Croatia grapples with its identity and the legacy of its past, while voices advocating for reconciliation and human rights strive to bring awareness to the ongoing cultural tensions within the nation.
Opponents of the concert, like Tena Banjeglav from Documenta, have expressed grave concerns, stating, “This has opened Pandora’s box... The government is fostering an environment where this rhetoric is seen as acceptable.” Conversely, defenders argue that Thompson’s military service during the war imbues his celebration of the chant with a legitimate context of freedom fighting.
The remarks from conservative commentator Matija Štahan suggest that the chant has taken on a "new meaning" in contemporary Croatia, likely resonating especially among the youth as a form of rebellion against the political mainstream. In contrast, organizations like the Youth Initiative for Human Rights (YIHR) condemn it outright, deeming it a fascist slogan that runs counter to Croatia’s obligations as an EU member and undermines acknowledgment of historical injustices.
The situation has been exacerbated by government reactions. Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic downplayed the significance of the chanting and has been photographed with Thompson, a move that has drawn ire from many. The ongoing nationalistic sentiment raises questions about the future of reconciliation efforts in Croatia, particularly as the government shifts focus towards celebrating military achievements over addressing past crimes.
Adding to the divide, historian Tvrtko Jakovina highlights how these developments are not just isolated incidents but part of a broader trend of rising nationalism and declining democratic values in Croatia post-Brexit. With key issues like tourism, climate change, and demographic challenges looming, critics accuse the government of diverting attention to foster nationalist sentiments instead of addressing pressing societal problems.
The implications of Thompson’s concert resonate deeply, as Croatia grapples with its identity and the legacy of its past, while voices advocating for reconciliation and human rights strive to bring awareness to the ongoing cultural tensions within the nation.
