Australia's world-first social media ban for children has taken effect, with throngs of teenagers waking up to find their accounts have gone dark. Others tell BBC they have already snuck past barriers and will continue scrolling and posting freely until they are caught.
The new law means social media firms - including Meta, TikTok and YouTube - must take 'reasonable steps' to ensure Australians aged under 16 don't hold accounts on their platforms.
The ban, eyed with excitement by global leaders and trepidation by tech companies, was justified as necessary to protect children from harmful content and algorithms - though critics have argued blanket prohibition is neither practical nor wise.
This landmark policy has been one of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's pet projects, and speaking to media on Wednesday he said he believed it has the power to change lives around the world. 'This is a day in which my pride to be prime minister of Australia has never been greater,' he said, flanked by parents and media figures who had pushed for the ban. 'This is Australia showing enough is enough.'
Countries like Denmark, Malaysia, Singapore, Greece, and Brazil are among those who have said they're looking at Australia as a test case. The Australian government has named 10 social media platforms as a start, including all of the most popular ones, but has also warned others it's coming for them next.
Polling shows the ban is wildly popular with parents, who hope it will also help reduce cyberbullying and child exploitation. However, it is far less popular with children, with some experts arguing it robs young people of vital connections.
While the government has insisted that social media companies have the resources to enforce the ban, Tech firms argue that regulators are overreaching. The future of this groundbreaking law remains to be seen as Australia navigates this unprecedented landscape.
The new law means social media firms - including Meta, TikTok and YouTube - must take 'reasonable steps' to ensure Australians aged under 16 don't hold accounts on their platforms.
The ban, eyed with excitement by global leaders and trepidation by tech companies, was justified as necessary to protect children from harmful content and algorithms - though critics have argued blanket prohibition is neither practical nor wise.
This landmark policy has been one of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's pet projects, and speaking to media on Wednesday he said he believed it has the power to change lives around the world. 'This is a day in which my pride to be prime minister of Australia has never been greater,' he said, flanked by parents and media figures who had pushed for the ban. 'This is Australia showing enough is enough.'
Countries like Denmark, Malaysia, Singapore, Greece, and Brazil are among those who have said they're looking at Australia as a test case. The Australian government has named 10 social media platforms as a start, including all of the most popular ones, but has also warned others it's coming for them next.
Polling shows the ban is wildly popular with parents, who hope it will also help reduce cyberbullying and child exploitation. However, it is far less popular with children, with some experts arguing it robs young people of vital connections.
While the government has insisted that social media companies have the resources to enforce the ban, Tech firms argue that regulators are overreaching. The future of this groundbreaking law remains to be seen as Australia navigates this unprecedented landscape.
